This video was presented last November 2 at The Green Unconference 2021. Click here to watch.
Permaculture has been popularized in different forms of traditional media such as books and magazines. Examples include Mollison and Holmgren’s groundbreaking “Permaculture One: A Perennial Agriculture for Human Settlements” (1981), Mollison’s “Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual” (1988), Holmgren’s “Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability” (2002), and “Permaculture Magazine,” a quarterly magazine published by Permanent Publications in the United Kingdom. Other popular titles include “Gaia’s Garden: A Guide to Home-Scale Permaculture” by Toby Hemenway (2001); and “Earth User’s Guide to Permaculture” by Rosemary Morrow (1994).
According to a bibliometric review of permaculture literature from 1978 to 2013 by Ferguson and Lovell in the publication, “Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Movement, and Worldview. A Review” (2013), journal articles make up the majority of publications (50) followed by graduate thesis (46) and books (41). It is worth noting though that majority of literature were not written by scientists, although results show that the share of scholarly work and t-reviewed articles have grown over time from 33% (1978-1982) to 71% (2008-2013). It was only in the early 2010s when permaculture designers started uploading content on new media platforms, such as YouTube, making it more accessible to the masses through computers and mobile devices. Examples of YouTube channels are “Discover Permaculture with Geoff Lawton” (August 24, 2015) and the “Oregon State University E-campus” (first permaculture-related content was uploaded on September 19, 2016). The UMASS permaculture documentary video that was uploaded in 2014 now has 166,000 views. Together with the creation of Facebook groups (2010) and the founding of Instagram (2010) and Pinterest (2010), interest in permaculture suddenly grew. There are currently 632,921 Instagram posts using the hashtag #permaculture, while Pinterest has almost a thousand permaculture designs ‘pinned’ on boards as of this writing.
According to Koohafkan et al in “Green Agriculture: Foundations for Biodiverse, Resilient and Productive Agricultural Systems” (2011), there are many interpretations as to how sustainable agriculture would be able to provide enough food in an age of climate change, increasing energy costs, social unrest, financial instability and increasing environmental degradation. Food security is a complex issue that warrants a creative solution through innovation and cooperation. Permaculture is one such solution. But it remains in the fringes of major topics in the academe in spite of its appeal and novelty. Permaculture’s ‘novelty production’ is highly dependent on dynamic learning processes that are being enabled by the cooperation of social networks as discussed by Charao-Marques et al. in “Constructing Sociotechnical Transitions Toward Sustainable Agriculture: Lessons from Ecological Production of Medicinal Plants in Southern Brazil” (2010). It is not only the methods of design that are worth studying but also the people who practice it. What are their motivations? How were they able to grasp a concept such as permaculture and integrate it into their lives? Food security is not just about producing more food. At the end of the day, it is all about collective action, or community action, to be more precise. It is a situation wherein people are sharing and working together, caring for one another and protecting the Earth.
The issue of food security in permaculture is akin to the concept of food sovereignty according to Peeters in “Permaculture as Alternative Agriculture” (2011). It is commonly understood by many as the ability to provide food for one’s family and the community by growing your own food in your own backyard. In 1996, La Via Campesina defined the concept of food sovereignty as “the right of people to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems” (Fernandez et al., 2012). Supplying the Earth’s growing population with a sufficient amount of food is often viewed as a challenge for the agriculture sector. True enough, farmers are indeed the managers of global useable lands that shape the Earth’s landscape today and in the next several decades to come (Lovell, et al., 2010).
Agricultural activities all over the world will continue to impact the environment and the ecosystems services that it provides at varying scales according to Lovell, et al. in “Integrating Agroecology and Landscape Multifunctionality in Vermont: An Evolving Framework to Evaluate the Design of Agroecosystems” (2010). Dogliotti et al. reports in “Designing sustainable agricultural production systems for a changing world: Methods and applications. Agricultural Systems” (2014) that in the next 40 years, the agriculture industry needs to increase food production by at least 70 percent on the same arable lands. Food security is often viewed as an issue of production. Though the agriculture sector’s current production schemes are efficient at producing food, it places the natural and social environments under a lot of stress as a consequence. Given this scenario, it is necessary to try new alternatives without compromising the health of these ecosystems. Currently, small-scale farming market systems compete with the high labor productivity of specialized and mechanized industrial farming systems according to a study by Ferguson and Lovell entitled, “Livelihoods and production diversity on U.S. permaculture farms” (2017). As a worldview shared in the grassroots movement, permaculture connects food insecurity to the current food production systems’ downplaying of innovation by smallholder farmers as described by Millner in “The Right to Food is Nature too: Food Justice and Everyday Environmental Expertise in the Salvadoran Permaculture Movement” (2016) and even backyard and small-scale gardeners.
It is important to remember that food security is not simply an issue of production—of who produces more and of better quality. It is also a political issue that deals with deciding which system of production is prioritized. Sustainable food systems follow a bottom-up approach and yet the top-down agrarian development programs for farmers run in conflict with their strategy (Millner, 2016). There is an existing dichotomy in the system today that labels one side as ‘knowers and innovators’ while the other is marginalized simply as ‘passive recipients’ (Millner, 2016) referring to the smallholder farmers and backyard food growers. Food security is a complicated issue entangled in the intricacies of politics, the complexities of the unpredictable bio-physical environment, and the beauty of the natural world. Nonetheless, steps have to be taken for a paradigm shift or what Ferguson and Lovell calls as a “transition to agroecological production” in their study, “Diversification and Labor Productivity on US Permaculture Farms” (2013).
What distinguishes permaculture from other approaches of alternative agriculture is its emphasis on conscious design (Krebs and Bach, 2018). Design, as a verb, refers to the “intentional transformation or modification of landscape features in a certain area which is expressed as graphic representation, conceptual description, and/or physical manifestation” (Lovell et al, 2010). On the other hand, design, as a noun, refers to “the spatial arrangement of landscape features resulting from the design process, either in the existing state or as a proposed future state” (Lovell et al, 2010).
A permaculture design is also characterized by the integration of manmade, natural, spatio-temporal, socio-cultural, and economic components of a system recognizing that social systems are not separate from natural or land use systems (Krebs and Bach, 2018). The functional relationships and interconnectedness of the components within the system are the main emphasis of whole-systems design (Mollison, 1988). Ferguson and Lovell (2013) summarize the most important features of planning with the use of permaculture. These include 1) identifying the site characteristics; 2) determining the interaction of individual elements (components) on several levels (scales); and 3) recognizing the spatial arrangements of elements as drivers of multi-functionality.
The main objective for permaculture designs is to have every component within the system to be multifunctional (Mollison, 1988). Each of these functions should be supported by a diversity of other components. The diversity of connections strengthens ecological processes and functions of the farm landscape (Mollison, 1992). Design can be modified during actual practice and learning from experience. It is a continuous and evolving process that is guided by the development and updating of information and skills that comes from observations and experiments from past experiences (Mollison, 1988). Malezieux (2012), discussed a three-step framework that is a common practice in permaculture: 1) observation of natural processes in the ecosystem; 2) development and experimentation of new techniques; and 3) implementation of new techniques.
According to Mollison in “Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual” (1992), permaculture design has four different components: techniques, strategies, materials and assemblies. Each component is defined as the following:
1. Techniques - a ‘one-dimensional’ concept which focuses on the ‘how’ of doing something.
2. Strategies - a temporal aspect of technique which is a means used in applying a technique to achieve a future goal.
3. Materials - refers to physical and natural resources which include implements, tools and technologies.
4. Assemblies - a component which incorporates technologies, structures, plants and animals in a design.
Permaculture design is guided by three core ethics: 1) care for the Earth, 2) care for people, and 3) fair share (Mollison, 1992). These three ethics are universally shared by all permaculture designers albeit varying in the phrasing of this moral code. Although permaculture ethics were not explicitly stated in early permaculture text (Holmgren, 2002), these were later narrowed down to three by Mollison and Holmgren as a result of their research in community ethics as practiced by religious groups and cooperatives (Holmgren, 2002). The ethics were used as a permaculture teaching tool which carried a universal message that is highly relatable to all cultures. This is especially true to indigenous peoples all over the world who are more attuned to the rhythms of nature compared to other groups of people. These ethics are also the basis for decision-making within a permaculture design system.
The three ethics of permaculture serve as the ethical and moral foundation in addressing design decisions and challenges in the real world. The essence of these ethics is then operationalized into design principles. Different authors have variations of these principles. Mollison provided 5 principles of design in “Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual” (1988); Holmgren expanded Mollison’s into 12 in “Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability” (2002); and Peeters et al combined their ideas into his own set of 12 ‘natural laws’ of design in “Systems Thinking – An Ecological Process” (2011).
Among the three, Holmgren’s version has been adopted and modified by many practitioners. He enumerated the following design principles: 1) observe and interact; 2) catch and store energy; 3) obtain a yield; 4) apply self-regulation and feedback; 5) use renewable resources; 6) produce no waste; 7) design from pattern to details; 8) integrate rather than segregate; 9) use small and slow solutions; 10); use and value diversity; 11) use the edges; and 12) creatively use and respond to change.
In a thesis entitled, “An Instructional Module on Permaculture Design Theory for landscape Architecture Student” (2016), Althouse categorized these twelve design principles into five design processes in the perspective of landscape architecture:
1) inventory and analysis (principles 1, 4, 5);
2) determine your needs (principles 2, 3, 6);
3) functional diagrams (principles 7, 8);
4) concept designs (principles 9, 10, 11);
5) final design (principle 12).
Aside from the design principles, permaculture designers use several methodologies for designing a project. Mollison (1988) enumerates ten methods of design as follows:
1) design by listing characteristics of components (analysis);
2) design by expanding on direct observations of a site (observation);
3) design by adopting lessons learned from nature;
4) design as a selection of options or pathways based on decisions (options and decisions);
5) design by map overlay (data overlay);
6) design by assessing the results of random assemblies (random assembly);
7) design for work places (flow diagrams);
8) design by the application of a master pattern (zone and sector analysis);
9) zoning of information and ethics; and
10) incremental design.
References
ALTHOUSE, KENI. 2016. An Instructional Module on Permaculture Design Theory for Landscape Architecture Students. Utah State University.
KREBS, JULIUS, S. BACH. 2018. Permaculture—Scientific Evidence of Principles for the Agroecological Design of Farming Systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), MDPI AG, 2018 vol: 10 (9).
HOLMGREN, DAVID. 2002. Permaculture: Principles & Pathways Beyond Sustainability. Permanent Publications. Australia.
FERGUSON, RAFTER SASS., S.T. LOVELL. 2013. Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Movement, and Worldview. A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
MALEZIEUX, ERIC. 2012. Designing cropping systems from nature. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 15–29.
MOLLISON, BILL. 1988. Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual. Australia. Tagari Publications.
The principles of permaculture design are deeply rooted in ecology with most of its ideas inspired by the works of ecologist Howard T. Odum on energy flows and complex living systems. In “Permaculture for agroecology: design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review” (2013) Ferguson and Lovell enumerated the agroecological principles (and its allied fields) that provided scientific basis for the permaculture principles published by Mollison (1988), Mollison and Slay (1997), and Holmgren (2004). The comparison of principles is listed in the table below:
Permaculture Principles |
Agroecology and Related Principles |
DIVERSITY |
|
Diversity, Plant Stacking &
Time Stacking (Mollison, 1988; Mollison & Slay, 1997) Use and Value Diversity (Holmgren,
2004) |
Species and genetic
diversification of the agroecosystem in time and space (Reijntjes et al.,
1992) Contain pests through complex
trophic levels (Malezieux, 2011) Maintain landscape heterogeneity
and capture environmental gradients (Fischer et al., 2008) |
INTERACTION |
|
Edge Effects (Mollison, 1988), Use
edges and value the marginal (Holmgren, 2004) Everything gardens (Mollison,
1988) Relative location (Mollison &
Slay, 1997) Each important function is
supported by many elements (Mollison, 1988), each element performs many
functions (Mollison, 1988) |
Optimize available resources
through synergies between “plants, animals, soil, water, climate and people”
(Pretty, 1994, Vandermeer, 1995) Use complementary functional
traits to ensure production and resilience (Malezieux, 2011) Enhance beneficial biological
interactions and synergisms (Reijntjes, et al., 1992) Enhance recycling of biomass and
optimizing nutrient availability and balancing nutrient flow (Reijntjes, et
al., 1992) |
CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION |
|
The problem is the solution
(Mollison, 1988) The yield of a system is
theoretically unlimited (or only limited by the imagination and information
of the designer) (Mollison, 1988) Make the least change for the greatest
possible effect (Mollison, 1988) |
No corollary agroecological
principles. |
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT |
|
Observe and interact (Holmgren,
2004) Apply self-regulation and accept
feedback (Holmgren, 2004) Creatively use and respond to
change (Holmgren, 2004) Accelerating succession and
evolution (Holmgren, 2004) |
Management by experiment (Nudds,
1999) Mobilize capacity for inquiry
(Blann et al., 2003) Detect and foster novelty (Blann
et al., 2003) Create opportunities for
self-organization (Folke et al., 2003) |
In support to the review by Ferguson and Lovell (2013), another publication entitled, “Permaculture—Scientific Evidence of Principles for the Agroecological Design of Farming Systems” by Krebs and Bach (2018) discussed the scientific evidence behind Holmgren’s permaculture design principles (2004). Their findings are reported in the table below:
Principle |
Approach |
Relation |
Examples with Evidence |
Observe and Interact |
Bottom-up |
Design process, management |
Adaptive management |
Catch and Store Energy |
Bottom-up |
Agroecosystem structure |
Organic mulch application Rainwater harvesting measures Woody elements in agriculture |
Obtain a Yield |
Bottom-up |
Design process, management |
Emergy evaluation Ecosystems services concept |
Apply Self-Regulation and Accept
Feedback |
Bottom-up |
Agroecosystem structure |
Enhancement of regulating
ecosystem services Natural habitats in agricultural
landscapes Wildflower strips |
Use and Value Renewable Resources
and Services |
Bottom-up |
Agroecosystem structure |
Legumes and animal manure as
nutrient source Mycorrhizal fungi |
Produce no Waste |
Bottom-up |
Agroecosystem structure |
Animal manure Human excreta Waste products as animal feed |
Design from Patterns to Details |
Top-down |
Agroecosystem structure, Design
process |
Natural ecosystem mimicry Use of grazing animals in cold and
dry climates Structurally complex
agroforests in tropical climates |
Integrate Rather than
Segregate |
top-down |
Agroecosystem structure |
Integration of livestock
in corn cropping Cereals and canola used
for forage and grain harvest Integration of fish in
rice cropping Polyculture (crops) |
Use Small and Slow
Solutions |
top-down |
Agroecosystem structure |
Inverse productivity-size relationship Agroforestry systems |
Use and Value Diversity |
top-down |
Agroecosystem structure |
Plant species diversity Pollinator diversity Habitat diversity Diversified farming systems |
Use Edges and Value the Marginal |
top-down |
Agroecosystem structure |
High field border density Field margins Edges with forests |
Creatively Use and Respond to Change |
top-down |
Design process, management |
Decision-making under
uncertainty Increase ecological
resilience Directed natural succession |
References
FERGUSON, RAFTER SASS., S.T. LOVELL. 2013. Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Movement, and Worldview. A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
KREBS, JULIUS, S. BACH. 2018. Permaculture—Scientific Evidence of Principles for the Agroecological Design of Farming Systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), MDPI AG, 2018 vol: 10 (9).
HOLMGREN, DAVID. 2004. Permaculture: Principles & Pathways Beyond Sustainability. Permanent Publications. Australia.
The widespread practice of modern industrial farming has led to the homogenization or simplification (Krebs and Bach, 2018) of landscapes. According to a study by Lanz et. al entitled “The Expansion of Modern Agriculture and Global Biodiversity Decline: An Integrated Assessment” (2018), this translates to the loss of global biodiversity and subsequent habitat loss. According to a study by Firbank, et al., “Assessing the impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity: a British perspective” (2007), biodiversity loss also affects the functioning of ecosystems services like pest control in the form of natural predator-prey relationships, pollination as a result of fauna-flora interactions, and nutrient cycling which contributes to the health and well-being of people in the long term as described by Tscharntke et al (2005) in “Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—Ecosystem service management.” However, with the use of permaculture as a framework, agricultural landscapes can become functionally complex in terms of regulatory, habitat, production, and information functions (de Groot et al (2002), simply because with such a framework, a set of principles is made available to create and maintain resilient agroecological systems according to a research by Krebs and Bach (2018) justifying the scientific foundations of permaculture in “Permaculture—Scientific Evidence of Principles for the Agroecological Design of Farming Systems.”
In actual practice all over the world, many studies provide evidence that farming systems that were designed using permaculture have the following characteristics: a) grow organic crops and livestock (Bethany, 2017) ; b) require less inputs (resources are cycled in a closed system); c) establish dense food forests (Roberts, 2017); d) have a high biodiversity (Roberts, 2017); e) apply popular management strategies such as intercropping (Engels, 2016); f) invest in perennial trees (Roberts, 2017); g) use appropriate technology (Corker and Barker, 2012); and h) maximize precipitation using rainwater harvesting (Roberts, 2017). Recent studies have also shown that the application of permaculture is already broadening its scope to include a) rural development (Rivett et al, 2018); b) climate change and social unrest (Karim, 2018); c) marine permaculture array technology (von Herzen, et al, 2017); d) the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (Isaac, 2016), and over-all social systems in general (Krebs and Bach, 2018).
Permaculture can also be viewed as a type of “new ecology” which focuses on meaningful interventions according to Hobbs et al. in “Intervention Ecology: Applying Ecology Science in the Twenty-First Century” (2011). Interventions are not limited to agriculture but also extend to all social structures and institutions. A study in Japan by Chakroun (2019) points out that permaculture is unique in such a way that it merges internationally-shared sustainable agriculture goals with the socio-cultural components of a sustainable lifestyle. Through the years, permaculture has been imagined in different ways but with a shared emphasis on design and ecology.
Thus, permaculture was defined in published work as a systems design approach directly working with nature (McManus, 2010); a design system for sustainable human habitats, rooted in ethics of environmentalism, humanism and equity (Henfrey, 2017); a design system guided by the principles of nature (Peeters, 2011); a holistic system of design that promotes the harmonious relationship between humans and nature (Caraway, 2018); and an agro-ecological systematic design tradition for maximizing the sustained flourishing of resource renewing cycles (Cassel, 2016).
Permaculture is a relatively new concept in the Philippine agriculture and development sectors. When and where it was exactly introduced is yet to be known. The lack of literature on the history of permaculture in the Philippines has proved difficult in identifying the actors involved in the history of the movement. As a result of this knowledge gap, there is still no published data regarding the profile of its adopters and the number of its practitioners in the country. Fortunately, we can gain insight into the permaculture movement by reviewing other sustainable (or alternative) farming systems, such as organic agriculture in particular. The author’s experience with local permaculture practitioners led to the hypothesis that the organic agriculture movement may have prepared the groundwork for permaculture to take root in the country. The two approaches are closely related since permaculture practitioners consider organic as the primary means of crop production within a permaculture design system.
Prior to the 1970s, the Philippines has been growing crops using traditional methods of farming (Lesaca, 2012 as cited by Suner et al, 2016) which can be considered ‘organic’ in today’s standards. Then global food security threats paved the way for a technological breakthrough in agriculture research and industry called the Green Revolution (Suner et al, 2016). After decades of ‘conventional’ or ‘industrial’ farming (Maghirang et al., 2013), landscapes began to change and the effects were damaging to both people and the environment. We can hypothesize that permaculture may have arrived in the 1980s at the time when non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and farmers’ groups began criticizing the Green Revolution and the effects of chemical farming on health and the environment. These sentiments were articulated by the Farmers Assistance Board in “Profits for Poison” by Noel Mondejar in 1980 and “The Miracle that Never Was” by the Agency for Community Education and Service in the mid-80s (Carating and Tejada, 2012). During this decade, NGOs advocated for a shift to traditional ways and promoted organic farming (Suner at el, 2016) in an attempt to restore farming communities and agricultural landscapes. It is also probable that permaculture may have entered the sustainable agriculture conversation in the 1990s when the low-external-input-sustainable-agriculture (LEISA) global movement gained traction in the Philippines through the formation of the Sustainable Agriculture Coalition and the Philippine Forum for Sustainable Agriculture (Carating and Tejada, 2012). Though there is no published evidence regarding the link between LEISA and permaculture in the country, the arrival of the former has helped push the larger sustainable agriculture agenda forward.
The earliest piece of published evidence of Filipino participation in the permaculture movement is found in the conference proceedings of the Sixth International Permaculture Conference in Perth, Australia in 1996. University of the Philippines Los Banos-College of Agriculture (UPLB-CA) professor, Teodoro Mendoza, presented a paper in the conference entitled, “Upscaling the Adoption of Ecologically Sound Agriculture in the Philippines” which promoted sustainable agriculture among rice farmers (Permaculture Association of Western Australia Inc., 1996). Coincidentally, just four years later, the Philippine Permaculture Association (PPA) was formed in 2000.
In an interview conducted by the author in 2018 with PPA director, Bert Peeters, it was revealed that permaculture was introduced to him by a Columban priest named Fr. John Leydon of the Global Catholic Climate Movement (GCCM) in the late 1990s. It was Peeters, a product of PRI-Australia in 2000, who conducted possibly the first Permaculture Design Certificate (PDC) course in 2008 at Cabiokid Foundation Inc. in Cabiao, Nueva Ecija. In 2010, graduates of the PDC course and the PPA organized the 1st Philippine Permaculture Convergence in Cebu. In the same year, the national government finally mainstreamed organic agriculture by implementing RA 10068 or the Organic Agriculture Act of 2010 through the Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Agriculture Program (Maghirang et al., 2013).
REFERENCES
ABDALA, PAULO R.Z. 2010. Ecovillages and Permaculture: A Reference Model for Sustainable Consumption? Encontro da ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, September 25-29, 2010.
ABIRAL, BURGE. 2019. Permaculture and Ecological Lifestyle: A Restricted Radicalism. Routledge Handbook of Radical Politics.
BRADLEY, PARKER, A. HILL, L. KIRKER, A. VAN HOUTEN, J. LAMY, J. KENNEY, L. KUZMITCH. 2011. Habitat Reforestation Through Permaculture and Agroforestry in Southern Belize. Plymouth State University. 10.1590/1809-4422asoc0083v2032017
BRAWNER, JUNE. 2015. Permaculture in the margins: realizing Central European regeneration. Journal of Political Ecology Vol 22 (1):429.
BUOT, JR., INOCENCIO E. K. OSUMI. 2004. Satoyama landscape in the Philippines. Journal of Nature Studies
CARATING, RODELIO B., S.Q. TEJADA. 2012. Sustainable organic farming in the Philippines: History and success stories. Workshop on ANSOFT-AFACI Pan-Asia Project, 18-20, 2012. Gwangju, Jeonnam Province, Republic of Korea.
CHAKROUN, LEILA. 2019. Cultivating Concrete Utopia: Understanding How Japan's Permaculture Experiments are Shaping a Political Vision of Sustainable Living. The International Academic Forum. Conference: Asian Conference for Sustainability, Energy and the Environment (ACSEE)
CROSBY, ALEXANDRA, J. LORBER, I. VANNI. 2014. Value the Edge: Permaculture as Counterculture in Australia. M/C Journal, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 6, oct. 2014. ISSN 14412616. Available at: <http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/915>. Date accessed: 31 jan. 2020.
DE GUZMAN, ROWENA P., G.L.M. NELSON, G.N.A. ABRIGO, R.D.T. BACONGUIS. 2017. Selected Organic Agricultural Organizations’ Social Networks in the Promotion of Organic Agriculture in Quezon Province, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, May 2017.
ESTEVES, ANA MARGARIDA. 2019. Peace Education for the Anthropocene? The Contribution of Regenerative Ecology and the Ecovillages Movement. Journal of Peace Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2019.1657817
FADAEE, SIMIN. 2019. The permaculture movement in India: a social movement with Southern characteristics. Social Movement Studies, Vol. 18, 2019 – Issue 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.162873
FERGUSON, RAFTER SASS & S.T. LOVELL. 2013. Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Movement, and Worldview: A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34, 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0181-6
FERNANDEZ, MARGARITA, K. GOODALL, M. OLSON, V.E. MENDEZ. 2012. Agroecology and Alternative Agri-Food Movements in the United States: Toward a Sustainable Agri-Food System. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, Vol 37
FLORES, JABEZ JOSHUA M., R.J. OBRERO, L.A. GELISAN, E.A. FORONDA, R.L. MENDIOLA. 2017. Creating Virtual Corridors: Social Network Discovery and Landscape Patch Connectivity of Permaculture Projects and Initiatives on Facebook. International Journal on Open and Distance e-Learning. December 2017 Issue, Vol. 3, No. 2. http://ijodel.com/?page_id=330
FRANKEL-GOLDWATER, LEE. 2012. Permaculture as a tool for implementing the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Master’s Thesis, Environmental Conservation Education. New York University, United States.
HEADEY, DEREK, O. ECKER. 2013. Rethinking the Measurement of Food Security: From First Principles to Best Practice. Food Security. 5:327-343
HIRSCHFELD, SARAH, R. VAN ACKER. 2019. Permaculture farmers consistently cultivate perennials, crop diversity, landscape heterogeneity and nature conservation. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.
HOLMGREN, DAVID. 2002. Permaculture: Principles & Pathways Beyond Sustainability. Permanent Publications. Australia.
ISMAIL, NOR ATIAH, S.M. AFFENDI. 2015. Awareness and Acceptability of Permaculture in a Residential Landscape Design: A Case Study of Denai Alam Community. Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology. AENSI Publisher
JANOS, SZILAGYI ALFRED. 2015. The Permaculture Design in the Open-air Museum of Szenna. Bachelor’s Thesis, Agricultural Engineering. Szent Istvan University, Hungary.
KELLY-BISSON, CHRISTOPHER. 2013. Forests For The People: Resisting Neoliberalism Through Permaculture Design. Master’s Thesis, Geography. Carleton University, Canada
KREBS, JULIUS, S. BACH. 2018. Permaculture—Scientific Evidence of Principles for the Agroecological Design of Farming Systems. Sustainability (Switzerland). 10(9), 3218; https://doi.org/10.3390/su1009321
LAFFOON, MEGAN. 2016. A Quantitative Analysis Of Hugelkultur And Its Potential Application On Karst Rocky Desertified Areas In China. Thesis in Agriculture. Western Kentucky University, United States. Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects. Paper 602.
LOVELL, SARAH TAYLOR, S. DESANTIS, C.A. NATHAN, M.B. OLSON, V.E. MENDEZ, H.C. KOMINAMI, DL ERICKSON, K.S. MORRIS, W.B. MORRIS. 2010. Integrating Agroecology and Landscape Multifunctionality in Vermont: An Evolving Framework to Evaluate the Design of Agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems,Vol 103, Issue 5
MAGHIRANG, RODEL G., R. DELA CRUZ, R.L. VILLAREAL. 2013. How Sustainable is Organic Agriculture in the Philippines? Trans. National Academy of Science and Technology (Philippines) Vol. 33 (No. 2). ISSN 0115-8848
MALEZIEUX, ERIC. 2012. Designing cropping systems from nature. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. January 2012, Vol. 32, Issue 1, pp. 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820354
MAXWELL, DANIEL, J. COATES, B. VAITLA. 2013. How do different indicators of household food security compare? Empirical evidence from Tigray. Feinstein International Center. Tufts University. Gerald J. and Dorothy R Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy
MAYER, ANNE-MARIE. 2019. Nutrition-Sensitive Outcomes of a Permaculture Project in Nepal. Field Exchange 59. Retrieved from www.ennonline.net/fex/59/permaculturenepal
MCCLEARY, SUSAN, J. CARFRAE, A.A.R. LORIS. 2016. An introduction and long-term viability of community sustainable agriculture projects within marginalised communities: a food sovereignty study. Fourth World Journal. Vol 14, Issue 2
MENDOZA, TEODORO C. 1996. Upscaling the Adoption of Ecologically Sound Agriculture in the Philippines. Proceedings of the Sixth International Permaculture Conference. September-October 1996. Perth, Western Australia. Copyright Permaculture Association of Western Australia Inc. and authors
MILLNER, NAOMI. 2016. The Right to Food is Nature too: Food Justice and Everyday Environmental Expertise in the Salvadoran Permaculture Movement. Local Economy, 22(6), 764-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.003
MOLLISON, BILL. 1988. Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual. Australia. Tagari Publications.
MUGWALL, THOMAS. 2017. ON THE PATH OF UNTRICKING HERMES Adaptation of the Design Philosophy and Methods of Permaculture in Community Engaged Art Projects. University of Tasmania
NAMULULI, ANASTANSIA MUSANA. 2011. The Potential of Permaculture in Addressing Food Insecurity in Karamoja District, Uganda. Master’s Thesis in Sustainable Development. Uppala University and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
PEETERS, BERT. 2011. Permaculture as Alternative Agriculture. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-486X.2008.00007.x
PERMACULTURE RESEARCH INSTITUTE – AUSTRALIA. 1158 Pinchin Rd, The Channon NSW 2480, Australia. https://permaculturenews.org/
PONT, LOUIS-MARIE. 2015. What is permablitz and does it impact on local communities? Bachelor’s thesis. Griffith University School of Environment
RIVETT, M.O., A.W. HALCROW, J. SCHMALFUSS, J.A. Stark, J.P. TRUSLOVE, S. KUMWENDA, K.A. HARAWA, M. NHELMA, C. SONGOLA, G.J. WANANGWA, A.V.M. MILLER, R.M. KALIN. 2017. Local scale water-food nexus: Use of borehole-garden permaculture to realise the full potential of rural water supplies in Malawi. US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. Journal of Environmental Management. 978-0908228010
ROBERTS, TOBIAS. 2017. Perennial polycultures and the richness of diversity. Retrieved from https://permaculturenews.org/2017/11/13/perennial-polycultures-richness-diversity/
ROTHE, KATJA. 2014. Permaculture Design: On the Practice of Radical Imagination. Berlin University of Arts, Germany. Afterlives of Systems Vol 3, Issue 1.
SUNER, ALBERT CHRISTIAN SESE, E.M. LIBETARIO, M.O. OLANDAY, T. MENDOZA. Mainstreaming Organic Agriculture in the Philippines: Challenges and Opportunities. Agroecology. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316452571_Mainstreaming_Organic_Agriculture_in_the_Philippines_Challenges_and_Opportunities
THIONG'O, WANGARI. 2017. Food security through permaculture: a case study of Samburu County. Master’s thesis on International Relations. United States International University-Africa. USIU-A Digital Repository
ULBRICH, RAISSA. 2016. Practising change(s) - Analysing the German niche of permaculture with a Social Learning perspective to monitor social change in sustainability transitions. Master’s Thesis, Industrial Ecology. Leiden University & Delft University of Technology, Germany.
VHURUMUKU, ELLIOT. 2014. Food Security Indicators. Integrating Nutrition and Food Security Programming for Emergency Response Workshop. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/food-security-capacity-building/docs/Nutrition/NairobiWorkshop/5.WFP_IndicatorsFSandNutIntegration.pdf
VON HERZEN, BRIAN, T. THEURETZBACHER, J. NEWMAN, M. WEBBER, C. ZHU, J.S. KATZ, M. RAMASWAMY. 2017. A Feasibility Study of an Integrated Air Conditioning, Desalination and Marine Permaculture System in Oman. 10th International Conference on Thermal Engineering: Theory and Applications
WANG, XUEYU. 2017. A using permaculture to enhance urban food security: an abandoned golf course case study. Master’s Thesis. Virginia Tech, United States
WISE, LUCY G. 2015. On the Ecological Thought of David Holmgren. Research Proposal. Social Science Research Proposal.
The interview was conducted by UPLB BS Development Communication student, Alpheus Loukas Ascan, last September 24, 2024 at UPOU for a requir...